INTRODUCTION
It is about increasing the efficiency of braking in racing vehicles by changing the size and
position of mounting of brake disc on another axle by reducing the rpm of the mounting axle and by without altering the
rpm of the live axle of the vehicle. We are using bevel gears for this.
BRAKES
Bakes are generally used to stop the
moving vehicles.
Here we made a change in the mounting
and positioning of a disc brake system.
Disc brakes are the most commonly
used braking system in many racing vehicles.
DISADVANTAGE IN NORMAL MOUNTING
In normal mounting the brake disc
should be less than the size of the hub.
In case of racing cars the normal
size of the tire is small and the size of the hub is smaller than that.
Because of that the effective radius
decreases and also the efficiency of the brake also decreases.
ADVANTAGE OF ALTERNATE MOUNTING:
In case of alternate mounting we can
change the mounting according to our requirement and the size of the disc can
be kept as per our wish.
So it overcomes the disadvantages
faced by smaller discs.
The effective radius of the disc also
gets increased and there is a better change in braking efficiency.
NORMAL MOUNTING:
Disc brakes are normally mounted on
the live axle of the vehicles and the brake lining will be like shown.
ALTERNATE MOUNTING:
In alternate mounting we are using bevel gears for transmission. Thus we
are making a perpendicular transmission from the live axle. By this method we
would be able to put a disc of larger size and the rpm can also be reduced as
per our requirement. We have kept the gear ratio as 2.
BRAKE LINING:
SPECIFICATION OF NORMAL AND ALTERNATE
MOUNTING:
NORMAL:
Brakes = Rear disc brake
Caliper used = Fixed caliper
Rotor
disc diameter =
158.75 mm
Weight of the vehicle =
200 kg
C.O.G . height = 76.2 mm
Wheel base = 1670
mm
Weight transfer to front = 90N
ALTERNATE:
Brakes = Rear disc brake
Caliper used = Fixed caliper
Rotor
disc diameter =
304.8mm
Weight of the vehicle =
200 kg
C.O.G . height = 76.2 mm
Wheel base = 1670
mm
TABULAR COLUMN
S.NO
|
VELOCITY
|
STOPPING DISTANCE
|
MASTER CYLINDER PRESSURE
|
BRAKING TORQUE
|
BRAKING FORCE
|
DECELERATION
|
PEDAL FORCE
|
STOPPING DISTANCE
|
UNIT
|
m/s
|
m
|
N/mm²
|
N-m
|
N
|
m/s²
|
N
|
m
|
NORMAL
|
||||||||
1
|
80
|
6.347
|
4.325
|
110.79
|
793.098
|
3.965
|
25
|
5.603
|
2
|
80
|
4.533
|
6.056
|
155.114
|
1110.23
|
5.551
|
35
|
4.002
|
ALTERNATE
|
||||||||
1
|
80
|
6.347
|
4.325
|
575.284
|
4138.751
|
20.693
|
0.27
|
0.8304
|
2
|
80
|
4.533
|
6.056
|
805.401
|
5794.25
|
28.97
|
0.30
|
0.69304
|
GRAPHS FOR NORMAL BRAKING:
GRAPHS FOR ALTERNATE MOUNTING:
Factor of safety – 3
Torque- 8.1kNm
Rpm-7000 to 3000
Stress applied-500N
CONCLUSION:
These reports prove that the
design is safe and hence we can get a good braking efficiency by this method.
Thus we improved the braking in less ground clearance vehicle by this method.